Talk NASA

Source From Wikipedia English.
Latest comment: 6 days ago by Cocobb8 in topic Work on bringing to Good Article
Former good articleNASA was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 8, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
June 9, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 28, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
June 15, 2020Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 1, 2004, October 1, 2005, October 1, 2006, July 29, 2008, July 29, 2009, July 29, 2010, July 29, 2013, July 29, 2016, and July 29, 2018.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of October 2, 2005.
Current status: Delisted good article
WikiProject iconAviation
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B checklist
WikiProject iconTechnology
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Government Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconOrganizations Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSpoken Wikipedia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconRocketry High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconScience Policy High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWeather: Space High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Space weather task force (assessed as High-importance).

Semi-protected edit request on 28 September 2023

it says the budget for the ISS was originally going to be $17.4 Alex Miranda52.314159 (talk) 22:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

That was NASA's plan originally, but plans can change. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. BilCat (talk) 22:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2024

Change ESDMD Associate administrator from James Free to Catherine A. Koerner

Change SOMD Associate administrator from Kathy Lueders to Kenneth D. Bowersox

Change STMD Associate administrator from James L. Reuter to Kurt "Spuds" Vogel Montanot (talk) 04:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

These changes have been announced and are reflected in the NASA bio pages:
I'm not certain whether these sources, rather than secondary sources as currently used, are preferred for this. Are there reliable secondary sources easily available? (sdsds - talk) 04:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
It seems to me that in this context the use of a primary source falls within the criteria of both WP:PRIMARY and WP:ABOUTSELF. — FenrisAureus (she/they) (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
  DoneFenrisAureus (she/they) (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

typo of the word apollo

in the moon landing section, at paragraph 5, line 4, the word apollo is spelled appollo. could somebody fix that quick Andpug1 (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Done. YBSOne (talk) 16:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Work on bringing to Good Article

Hello all! I will be starting work to bring this article to a good article status over the next couple of weeks. Any suggestions, comments, concerns welcome below! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

The final two paragraphs of the "Moon landing" subsection don't really seem to belong there. The second paragraph should also be reworded and expanded. Ships & Space(Edits) 21:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
@Ships&Space, thanks for the thoughts! Do you think the last two paragraphs be kept in the NASA article to another section or deleted altogether? Will work on re-wording/expanding second paragraph. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 23:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)