Talk Ernst Lindemann

Source From Wikipedia English.
Latest comment: 7 years ago by K.e.coffman in topic Neo-Nazi publication
Featured articleErnst Lindemann is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 27, 2011.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 17, 2011WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
March 2, 2011Good article nomineeListed
April 5, 2011WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
May 1, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 28, 2017, March 28, 2021, and March 28, 2024.
Current status: Featured article
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Maritime / European / German / World War I / World War II / Operation Majestic Titan
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.WikiProject icon
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Maritime warfare task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
German military history task force
Taskforce icon
World War I task force
Taskforce icon
World War II task force
Taskforce icon
Operation Majestic Titan (Phase IV)
Additional information:
Note icon
This article has passed an A-Class review.
WikiProject iconGermany Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neo-Nazi publication

I removed one citation to Clemens Range: diff. This is intricate detail and immaterial. The publication itself has been described as neo-Nazi in this discussion: User talk:Hawkeye7/Archive 2016#Neo-Nazi publications. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

The opinion of one editor is not sufficient. This is a featured article, and the information is entirely relevant. Dishonest edit summaries are disruptive. Dapi89 (talk) 16:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
I consider the statement to be trivia and unnecessary: "Lindemann was the 94th recipient of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross in the Kriegsmarine."

References

If he were the 4th recipient, then maybe it would be worth including, but the 94th? K.e.coffman (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
K.e. and I don't often agree on what constitutes "intricate detail", and I can't speak to the reliability or otherwise of the source, but I also think there is no reason to include this particular detail -- first few or last few should be worth mentioning but beyond that seems a bit unnecessary. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
It is interesting and worthy of note. It doesn't matter which number it was. And above all, it is a fact. Dapi89 (talk) 18:20, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
The inclusion of this material fails WP:DUE. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Opinion. This is a fact. Reverted. Dapi89 (talk) 15:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

I've reached out to the WP:NPOVN. The thread is Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Fringe source in WWII bio article. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)