Talk 1960

Source From Wikipedia English.
WikiProject iconYears Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ToC

uh, Why is the table of contents at the BOTTOM of the page?

Format

26-June-2007: The years 1900-1999 have a condensed Table of Contents since 28May07. See Talk:1950#Format (and "Talk:1950#Condensed TOC"). -Wikid77 22:05 26-June-2007

2004 page layout years

There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout.

For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at).

Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done.

Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically). (talk)--BozMo 14:19, 7 May 2004 (UTC)

OECD

There are two dates given.. which is right? 69.70.147.129 12:54, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Soundgarden?

"September 4 - Kim Thayil, Guitarist of the now defunct grunge band Soundgarden is born"

This is offensive and probably vandalism. The birth of some random member of a semi-famous rock band is not noteworthy enough for this page. I am removing it.

Such a person would qualify to be included in the Births section of the article, but certainly not the Events section. Lkjhgfdsa 0 (talk) 17:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Ships

I don't see the immediate relevance of "Ship events" at the bottom of the page. I feel this should be in a seperate article. Any thoughts? Jellevc (talk) 10:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure what is meant here by "immediate relevance". However, I agree that it's not really an important enough issue to warrant a section of its own here. If you can think of another article where it would be more appropriate to add this information then fine. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Adam Clayton

Adam Clayton id not Irish. He was born in England. Someone should fix that. Miss Bono [zootalk] 20:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 23:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)